: Jörg-Heiner Möller
: Post-Vac - the covered-up disaster A doctor reports
: novum publishing
: 9781642686494
: 1
: CHF 17.90
:
: Erzählende Literatur
: English
: 336
: Wasserzeichen
: PC/MAC/eReader/Tablet
: ePUB
Those who suffer never have the desire to remain silent. Those who do not suffer, on the other hand, benefit from suffering. It is a move on the chessboard of power, a hidden threat, an invitation to remain silent ... Some were eagerly awaiting it, driven by fear and anxiety: finally it had arrived, the vaccine against the corona death-bringer! Others, on the other hand, were skeptical about this supposed miracle weapon: what if the vaccine did more harm than good? The days of trembling and hesitation are over - they are now being replaced by sickness and suffering, which nobody wants to see - or is allowed to see? Jörg-Heiner Möller, himself not initially an opponent of vaccination, gets to the bottom of the covered-up vaccination catastrophe, revealing deep abysses of world power politics ...

 

Foreword

Today I sent the clinical observational study of 228 patients from my clinic to theGerman Medical Journalfor publication, observation period April 2022 to May 2023.

Out of these, 158 patients developed an unexplained, chronic and life-threatening disease immediately after vaccination; 58 patients developed the same symptoms after corona infection; and 12 patients could not be precisely identified because the corona infection occurred immediately after vaccination.

I described the symptoms, the signs of the disease – predominantly severe fatigue and cognitive disorders, and more – and I determined autoantibodies against the body's own structures in the 228 patients, so-called agonistic receptor autoantibodies, 94 percent of which were positive, a clear sign that this must be a newly developed autoimmune disease.

I took detailedanamneses (this is what doctors call asking about what came before, literally: previous memory, previous knowledge), I followed the course of the disease over months and years, and I was increasingly horrified by this disease, which was so difficult to grasp.

I have created tables and graphs according to the rules of scientific work, resembling the established sequence of dance steps, spicing it all up with scientific quotations on the subject – this is also part of the established rituals of this academic dance course.

This paper, although sent via the Internet, that is, by email rather thanpaper, will be rejected for publication.This is predictable.

My clinical observational study will be submitted to two reviewers to assess its quality, which has always been the rule in the editorial department of theDeutsches Ärzteblatt. These two reviewers, as professors with the appropriate weight of academic dignity, will then speak out against the publication, which is also predictable.

They will doubt my statistics, they will refer to the completely different figures from the renowned Paul Ehrlich Institute on vaccination side effects, they will accuse me of a lack of standardization of my medical history, they will devalue my clinical observations by positioning publications from renowned universities against my conclusions drawn from the clinical observations, theywill present my observations, which have now been collected and systematically analyzed for over 2 years, as the aberrations of a single, non-specialist doctor from the provinces. This may be formulated in a somewhat friendlier and more polite way but it will devalue my clinical observation study.

It is predictable.

They will pit names of standing and weight in the scientific world, heavyweights against me as a scientific lightweight.

The outcome of the fight is clear: I am knocked out in this way, even before I can enter the ring and fight. This is also predictable, and all for one reason:

If my observations of currently more than 300 patients are correct, then the vaccination campaign against the corona