God’s judgment during the Covid-19 pandemic
It felt like being persecuted but make no mistake we were judged according to our nonparticipation in the political arena of this nation Canada within the last four decades.
The Apostle Peter stated that judgment starts with
the Church.
“For the time has come for judgment to begin at the house of God; and if it begins with us first, what will be the end of those who do not obey the gospel of God?”
1 Peter 4:17
It is my view that Canadian churches were placed under God’s judgment during the Covid-19 pandemic as was the nations. The Charter of Rights and Freedoms was challenged and abused in all aspects of our lives. IT FAILED TO PROTECT the believers and unbelievers alike.
The Charter of Rights and Freedoms is not a privilege. The Charter of Rights and Freedoms is a constitution, an institution that is the supreme law in Canada. It recognized the Supremacy of God. The Charter of Rights and Freedoms failed to protect our rights to make choices during the unfounded pandemic mandates. We are now in the year end of 2022, and much has changed since I published the book in 2018, it has become worse. The government not only has complete control over the education of our children but also of our Christian Religious Gathering” within our church building, regarding restrictions on the number of people allowed in the building at one assembly. The church building is no longer respected as a sanctuary1. Below you will see the ruling made by the Superior Court of Justice. Ruling on the Constitutional Validity of Religious Gathering Restrictions (Covid-19).
According to a ruling by ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE, The Honourable Judge Renee M. Pomerance stated, quote
Section [173],
“Hence, I have little hesitation in concluding that, while numerical and percentage gathering limits infringed s. 2(a) of the Charter, the salitary benefits of these restrictions outweighed the deleterious effects on religious freedom. Ontario has met its burden to establish that the regulations in issue are reasonable limits, demonstrably justified in a free and democratic society.”
And then he, (the judge) criticized the respondents in these words insection [172]
“I accept that this is a legitimate aspiration. However, it does not change the outcome in this case. I note, by way of digression, that, by breaching the law, the claimants showed a lack of respect for state authority. Their disobedience is, for constitutional purposes, beside the point. What does matter is the respect shown by Ontario to religious institutions by tailoring restrictions and easing them when it was possible to do so. Full accommodation of religious freedom would not have resulted in “legitimate inconvenience” for the government. It would have represented a wholesale abdication of government responsibility to act in the public interest. It would have meant turning a blind eye to the threat of severe health consequences for a large swath of the population.”
The whole verdict can be viewed on this web link,Ontario v. Trinity Bible Chapel et al, 2022 ONSC 1344 (CanLII)
Will it be appealed to the Supreme Court of Canada? It has not been announced yet.
Canada’s institutions were conquered by treachery
In the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, section 1 says that all rights in the Charter are protected subject to reasonable limits. This does two things: (1) it guarantees all rights in the Charter; (2) it provides an approach to the limitation of the rights. In Canada, once a right has been violated in a law, the burden shifts to the Government to prove that the violation is a “reasonable limit, prescribed by law in a free and democratic society. This requires that the