: Mario Talamanca
: Gerhard Thür, Eva Cantarella, Joseph Mélèze Modrzejewski, Michael Gagarin, Alberto Maffi
: Dike Ouk Eisagogimos Contributi allo studio del processo attico
: Österreichische Akademie der Wissenschaften Verlag
: 9783700181644
: 1
: CHF 19.00
:
: Recht
: Italian
: 171
: kein Kopierschutz
: PC/MAC/eReader/Tablet
: PDF
After the democratic restoration in 403 BC a defendant was allowed to oppose a statement (paragraphe) that the case could not be brought to trial on formal grounds. Some scholars believe that the formal question was decided by the court as a separate preliminary case; for other scholars the two questions - the formal one and the material one - were considered together: if the paragraphe was defeated, the jurors passed directly to a vote on the case itself. The author discusses carefully the various opinions on the subject and presents his own solution, based on a cautious analysis of the ancient sources: in a single vote the jurors decided if the defendant's paragraphe or the plaintiff's plaint was winning the case.
01.Premessa2_4_16Th.doc5
02.Indice16_1_17Pa.doc7
03.Introd_30_1_17PaMaTh9
03.Introd_SeiteXVIIIleer18
04.Capitolo_I_16_1_17Pa.doc19
05.Capitolo_II_26_1_17PaTh54
06.Bibliografia26_1_17PaMaTh177
07.IndiceFonti_26_1_17PaMaTh183