| Book Cover | 1 |
---|
| Imprint | 4 |
| Contents | 5 |
| Introduction (Martin Rothgangel, Kerstin von Brömssen, Hans-Günter Heimbrock and Geir Skeie) | 7 |
---|
| 1. The issue | 7 |
| 2. The origin | 8 |
| 3. The articles | 9 |
| 4. Acknowledgments | 12 |
| Socio-spatial theories – a short introduction (Kerstin von Brömssen ) | 15 |
---|
| A view back | 16 |
| Religious studies and socio-spatial theories | 17 |
| Education and socio-spatial theories | 17 |
| References | 18 |
| Theoretical and methodological aspects of the concepts of place and space (Ina ter Avest and Cok Bakker) | 21 |
---|
| 1. Introduction | 21 |
| 2. From ‘time’ to ‘place’ | 21 |
| 3. From ‘non-place’ to ‘place’ | 23 |
| 4. The architecture of ‘place’ | 24 |
| 5. ‘Society of mind’ | 25 |
| References | 26 |
| A phenomenological approach (Hans-Günter Heimbrock) | 29 |
---|
| 1 Location, place and space | 29 |
| 2 Religious Education | 31 |
| References | 32 |
| Location, place and space (Julia Ipgrave) | 33 |
---|
| 1. Introduction | 33 |
| 2. Definitions and relationships | 33 |
| 3. Examples of location, place and space | 35 |
| 3.1 Clonmacnoise, Co. Offally | 35 |
| 3.2 India and Navratri celebration in a Leicester school hall | 35 |
| 3.3 A corner of Nye Bevan Estate, Hackney | 36 |
| 4. Final word: religion and the school | 37 |
| Spatial and temporal explanations in researching religious education (Nigel Fancourt) | 39 |
---|
| Introduction | 39 |
| Two spatial turns | 39 |
| Problematising the temporal in research on religious education | 40 |
| Accounting for the temporal in the spatial | 41 |
| References | 43 |
| The RE classroom as a safe public space. Critical perspectives on dialogue, demands for respect, and nuanced religious education (Christina Osbeck, Karin Sporre and Geir Skeie) | 49 |
---|
| Abstract | 49 |
| 1. Introduction | 49 |
| 2. Previous Research | 50 |
| 3. Three theoretical perspectives | 53 |
| 3.1 The Interpretive Approach | 53 |
| 3.2 The Interactive Universalism of Seyla Benhabib | 54 |
| 3.3 Discursive power challenging edificative and enlarged dialogues | 55 |
| 4. Re/presenting and discussing Islam in an RE class – an ‘unsafe’ empirical example | 55 |
| 4.1 A short summary of the lesson | 56 |
| 4.2 Conflicting worldview discourses – an overarching interpretation of the processes affecting the dialogue | 57 |
| 4.3 To become (an abstract) representative of a religion | 57 |
| 4.4 Focus on colloquial aspects of practice | 59 |
| 4.5 Sexual morality and nudity as central Islamic questions | 60 |
| 4.6 Teacher’s difficulty in changing the hegemonic speech genre | 60 |
| 4.7 The classroom communication as examples of edificative and enlarged dialogues? | 61 |
| 5. Discussion | 61 |
| References | 63 |
| In different worlds. Religious discourses in students’ space in three upper secondary schools in Sweden (Kerstin von Brömssen and Signild Risenfors) | 67 |
---|
| Abstract | 67 |
| 1. Introduction | 67 |
| 2. Theoretical approach – relational place and space | 69 |
| 2.1 Interviews as conversations | 70 |
| 2.1.1 Three different schools within the same urban area | 71 |
| 2.2 The overarching discourse – “Religion is not important” | 72 |
| 2.2.1 School X – a critical educational discourse | 73 |
| 2.2.2 School Y – a discourse of diversity | 75 |
| 2.2.3 School Z – a cultural “Bildung” discourse | 77 |
| Conclusion | 80 |
| References | 83 |
| Crucifixes in classrooms. The pedagogical assumptions of the European Courts (Nigel Fancourt) | 87 |
---|
| Abstract | 87 |
| Introduction: law, religion and education across Europe | 87 |
| Lautsi v Italy: the case | 89 |
| Pedagogy and ‘passive symbols’ | 92 |
| Socio-cultural theories of visual culture | 94 |
| A spatial pedagogy of religious symbols | 96 |
| Conclusion | 98 |
| References | 99 |
| Place attachment and sense of place Transformation of spaces into places children feel attached to (Ina ter Avest and Cok Bakker) | 101 |
---|
| Abstract | 101 |
| 1. Introduction | 101 |
| 2. Location, three primary schools in the Bijlmerdistrict in Amsterdam | 102 |
| 3. Theoretical framework | 104 |
| 4. Research method, presentation of data and preliminary results of data-analysis | 106 |
| 4.1 Presentation of data | 107 |
| 4.2 Preliminary results and reflection | 108 |
| 5. Concluding remarks and recommendations | 109 |
| References | 110 |
| Transforming local places to learning spaces in religious education. Revisiting a collaborative research project (Geir Skeie) | 115 |
---|
| Abstract | 115 |
| 1. Introduction | 115 |
| 2. Setting the scene. Symbolic landscapes | 116 |
| 3. Location of the community of practice seminars | 117 |
| 4. Moving out of the local and national comfort zone | 119 |
| 5. Nature as ‘place’ and a ‘space’ | 120 |
| 6. The house as a ‘place’ and room as ‘space’ | 122 |
| 7. Discussion | 125 |
| References | 128 |
| The relevance of location, space and place for religion teachers. A secondary analysis of an empirical study in Germany (Martin Rothgangel in cooperation with Christhard Lück and Philipp Klutz) | 131 |
---|
| Abstract | 131 |
| 1. Sample, method, and context of the study | 132 |
| 1.1 Sample and method | 132 |
| 1.2 Context of the study | 133 |
| 2. Findings from the secondary analysis | 134 |
| 2.1 The reference field of religion teachers | 134 |
| 2.2 Religious education as a safe space | 136 |
| 2.3 Religious education: A place for denominations without separation | 137 |
| 2.4 The position of religious education in the schools context | 139 |
| 2.5 Cooperation with local parishes | 141 |
| 2.6 Cooperation with non-Christian religious communities | 143 |
| 2.7 Training – local and interregional | 146 |
| 3. The relevance of location, space and place for religion teachers | 146 |
| References | 148 |
| No location. The problem o
|