: Christoph Helmig
: Forms and Concepts Concept Formation in the Platonic Tradition
: Walter de Gruyter GmbH& Co.KG
: 9783110267242
: Commentaria in Aristotelem Graeca et ByzantinaISSN
: 1
: CHF 143.40
:
: Antike
: English
: 407
: Wasserzeichen
: PC/MAC/eReader/Tablet
: PDF
< >Forms and Concepts is the first comprehensive study of the central role of concepts and concept acquisition in the Platonic tradition. It sets up a stimulating dialogue between Plato’s innatist approach and Aristotle’s much more empirical response. The primary aim is to analyze and assess the strategies with which Platonists responded to Aristotle’s (and Alexander of Aphrodisias’) rival theory. The monograph culminates in a careful reconstruction of the elaborate attempt undertaken by the Neoplatonist Proclus (6th century AD) to devise a systematic Platonic theory of concept acquisition.


< >Christoph Helmig, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Germany.

<
A word of thanks11
Introduction13
1. ‘How comes the mind to be furnished?’13
2. Survey of recent literature17
3. Structure and contents of this study21
I. Concepts – (ancient) problems and solutions25
1. What is a concept?25
2. The relevance of concepts in ancient epistemological debates36
3. Different models of concept acquisition in antiquity41
4. Forms and concepts41
4741
II. Plato on learning as recollection51
1. Forms and concepts51
1.1. The role of concepts in Plato51
1.2. Forms, concepts, language53
2. The Parmenides and the archaeology of conceptualism57
2.1. Concepts as ‘one over many’57
2.2. Refuting conceptualism?60
2.3. Conclusion63
3. The Meno on the different stages of recollection64
3.1. The transition from opinion (doxa) to knowledge64
3.2. Conclusion68
4. The Phaedo on the necessity of innate knowledge69
4.1. The deficiency argument (Phaedo 72e–77a)69
4.2. The continuity between Meno and Phaedo76
5. The Phaedrus on acquiring universal concepts77
5.1. Recollection and concept attainment (Phaedrus 249b–c)77
5.2. Forms, concepts, language again82
5.3. Conclusion83
6. Concept formation and concepts in the Timaeus, Theaetetus, and Sophist83
6.1. Recollection in Plato’s later works83
6.2. Innateness and the structure of the human soul85
7. The limits of recollection90
7.1. Some problematic concepts90
7.2. Recollection and error95
8. Forms, concepts, and recollection96
III. Aristotle’s reaction to Plato99
1. Aristotle and his teacher Plato99
1.1. A strange couple99
1.2. Aristotle’s arguments against innate knowledge100
2. The origin and nature of mathematical concepts102
2.1. Concepts and the division of sciences102
2.2. A troublesome emendation104
2.3. Abstraction and the qua-operator108
2.4. Aristotelian and Platonic separation110
2.5. Mathematical objects and concepts112
2.6. Linking abstractionM and induction?120
3. Universal concepts – induction (epagoge) and its different domains123
3.1. A general definition of induction124
3.2. Induction and its different domains125
3.3. The language of induction126
3.4. Different kinds of induction in Aristotle128
3.4.1. Induction in dialectical and rhetorical practice128
3.4.2. Digression: likeness and the charge of circularity131
3.4.3. Induction in ethics and natural science133
3.4.4. The troublesome case of ‘complete’ or ‘perfect induction’134
3.5. Induction and the starting points of syllogism137
4. Induction of first principles (Posterior Analytics II 19)140
4.1. Introduction140
4.2. What is the object of Analytica Posteriora II 19?141
4.3. Articulation and summary of the argument144
4.4. The relation of sense perception and intellect146
IV. Three case studies: Alcinous, Alexander146
153146
1. Alcinous between empiricism and recollection153
1.1. The doctrine of the doxastic logos154
1.2. Alcinous’ psychology156
1.3. Empiricism vs. innate knowledge159
2. Alexander of Aphrodisias159
166159
2.1. Alexander – elaborating Aristotle’s notion of abstraction167
2.2. Neoplatonic readings of Alexander169
2.3. Immanent forms, definitional natures, and universal concepts173
2.4. A unitary theory of intellect?176
2.5. Porphyry – an abstractionist malgré lui?183
2.6. The ‘short commentary’ on Aristotle’s Categories184
2.7. The epistemological digression in the commentary on Ptolemy187
3. Plotinus – ‘Wegbereiter’ of Syrianus and Proclus196
3.1. The doctrine of the twofold nature of the logoi (I): logoi as criteria in perceptual judgements198
3.2. The doctrine of the twofold nature of the logoi (II): logoi as causes in matter203
3.3. Plotinus on innate knowledge and recollection207