: Elizabeth E. Shively
: Apocalyptic Imagination in the Gospel of Mark The Literary and Theological Role of Mark 3:22-30
: Walter de Gruyter GmbH& Co.KG
: 9783110272888
: Beihefte zur Zeitschrift für die neutestamentliche WissenschaftISSN
: 1
: CHF 162.40
:
: Christentum
: English
: 308
: Wasserzeichen/DRM
: PC/MAC/eReader/Tablet
: PDF
< >This narrative study uses Mark 3:22–30 as an interpretive lens to show that the Gospel of Mark has a thoroughly apocalyptic outlook. Unlike many narrative studies, this book clarifies Mark’s symbols, metaphors, and themes in view of the socio-religious context in which it was written. Mark’s apocalyptic discourse portrays the Spirit-filled Jesus in a struggle against Satan to free people for a community that does God’s will. This discourse develops throughout the Gospel, functioning to persuade readers that God displays power from weakness, and offering a coherent reading of Mark.



< >Elisabeth E. Shively,St. Mary’s College, University of St. Andrews, Scotland.

Chapter One : The Shape of the Question13
1.1 Introduction13
1.2 The Aims of the Book15
1.3 History of Interpretation18
1.3.1 The Parabolic Character of Mark 3:22 – 3018
1.3.2 The Literary Character of Mark 3:22 – 3024
1.3.2.1 Rhetorical and Structural Analyses26
1.3.2.2 Narrative Analyses28
1.3.3 The Apocalyptic Character of Mark 3:22 – 3032
1.3.3.1 Defining Mark as “Apocalyptic”33
1.3.3.1.1 James M. Robinson34
1.3.3.1.2 Norman Perrin34
1.3.3.1.3 Howard Clark Kee35
1.3.3.1.4 Adela Yarbro Collins35
1.3.3.1.5 Joel Marcus36
1.3.3.1.6 Ched Myers37
1.3.3.1.7 Conclusion37
1.3.3.2 Approaches to Mark 3:22 – 30 as Apocalyptic38
1.3.3.2.1 Jennifer Ann Glancy39
1.3.3.2.2 Rikki E. Watts40
1.3.3.2.3 Ched Myers40
1.4 The Approach of the Book41
1.4.1 Reading Mark 3:22 – 30 as the Construction of a Symbolic World41
1.4.2 Reading Mark 3:22 – 30 Inner-Textually and Intertextually45
1.4.3 Reading Mark 3:22 – 30 as Apocalyptic Discourse49
1.5 The Plan of the Book51
Chapter 2: Analysis of Mark 3:22 – 3053
2.1 Introduction53
2.2 Literary Context of Mark 3:22-3054
2.2.1 The First Frame, 1:12 – 13 and 3:22 – 3055
2.2.1.1 The Literary Context of Isaiah 40:356
2.2.1.2 The Literary Contexts of Exodus 23 :20 and Malachi 3 :157
2.2.1.3 The Juxtaposition of Isaiah 40:3 and Malachi 3:1 in Mark 1:2 – 358
2.2.2 The Second Frame, 3:7 – 12 and 4:1-261
2.2.3 The Third Frame, 3:20 – 21, 31-3563
2.3 The Structure of Mark 3:22 – 3067
2.3.1 Synoptic Comparison67
2.3.2 Literary Analysis69
2.4 Interpretation of Mark 3:22 – 3071
2.4.1 The charge: vv. 22 and 3071
2.4.2 Jesus’ Tri-Faceted Refutation, vv. 23-2974
2.4.2.1 First Facet of the Refutation: How Jesus Does Not Cast Out Demons (vv. 23 – 26)74
2.4.2.2 Second Facet of the Refutation: How Jesus Casts Out Demons (v. 27)79
2.4.2.2.1 Resolving an Apparent Contradiction: The Solutions of Joel Marcus and Austin Busch81
2.4.2.2.2 Resolving an Apparent Contradiction: My Solution83
2.4.2.3 Third Facet of the Refutation: The Power by which Jesus Casts Out Demons (vv. 28 – 29)88
2.5 The Symbolic World that Mark Constructs in 3:22 – 3093
2.6 Conclusion94
Chapter 3 : Apocalyptic Discourse in Jewish Tradition96
3.1 Introduction96
3.2 Approaching the Literature: Genre and Apocalyptic Discourse97
3.2.1 The Book of Daniel99
3.2.2 1 Enoch102
3.2.3 Jubilees103
3.2.4 Testaments of the Twelve Patriarchs104
3.2.5 War Scroll (1QM)106
3.2.6 Melchizedek (11QMelch)107
3.2.7 Testament of Solomon108
3.3 The Book of Daniel as a Template110
3.3.1 Persecution111
3.3.2 Heavenly Beings112
3.3.3 Judgment115
3.4 Applying the Template117
3.4.1 Persecution117
3.4.1.1 1 Enoch117
3.4.1.2 Jubilees119
3.4.1.3 Testaments of the Twelve Patriarchs120
3.4.1.4 War Scroll (1QM)121
3.4.1.5 Melchizedek (11QMelch)122
3.4.1.6 Testament of Solomon123
3.4.2 Heavenly Beings125
3.4.2.1 1 Enoch125
3.4.2.2 Jubilees127
3.4.2.3 Testaments of the Twelve Patriarchs128
3.4.2.4 War Scroll (1QM)131
3.4.2.5 Melchizedek (11QMelch)134
3.4.2.6 Testament of Solomon135
3.4.3 Judgment138
3.4.3.1 1 Enoch138
3.4.3.2 Jubilees141
3.4.3.3 Testaments of the Twelve Patriarchs142
3.4.3.4 War Scroll (1QM)145
3.4.3.5 Melchizedek (11QMelch)147
3.4.3.6 Testament of Solomon149
3.5 Comparison of Compositions149
3.5.1 The Shared Symbolic World150
3.5.2 Different Aims of Apocalyptic Discourse151
3.5.2.1 Binding of Evil Spirits152
3.5.2.2 Agents of Judgment154
3.5.2.3 Negative Examples154
3.5.2.4 The Response of the Righteous to Oppressors155
3.5.2.5 The Salvation of the Righteous at the Judgment155
3.6 Mark 3:22-30159
3.6.1 The Shared Symbolic World159
3.6.2 The Distinctive Aims of Mark's Apocalyptic Discourse161
Chapter 4 : Mark’s Apocalyptic Discourse in Character, Plot and Narrative165
4.1 Introduction165
4.2 A Character Study165
4.2.1 Mark’s Characterization of Jesus166
4.2.2 Mark’s Characterization of Satan170
4.2.3 Mark’s Characterization of the Holy Spirit175
4.2.4 Mark’s Characterization of the Scribes178
4.3 Conclusion182
Chapter 5: Mark’s Apocalyptic Discourse in a Story (5:1—20) and a Speech (13:5 – 37)184
5.1 Introduction184
5.2 The Ger