| Buchtitel | 1 |
---|
| Acknowledgements | 5 |
---|
| Contents | 7 |
---|
| List of Abbreviations | 10 |
---|
| Part I: Introduction | 11 |
---|
| 1. Introduction | 11 |
| Part II: Literature | 17 |
---|
| 2. Multiculturalism | 19 |
| 2.1 Overview of multiculturalism | 19 |
| 2.2 Mainstream multiculturalism | 21 |
| 2.3 Critiques of Multiculturalism | 22 |
| 2.4 Contemporary debates | 24 |
| 2.5 Concluding remarks | 30 |
| 3. Norwegian sexualities | 32 |
| 3.1 Introduction | 32 |
| 3.2 The work of Åse Røthing, an example of the Norwegian Sexualities Approach | 33 |
| 3.3 Discussion | 35 |
| 4. The interpretive approach to religious education | 38 |
| 4.1 The interpretive approach: A presentation | 38 |
| 4.2 Relating the interpretive approach to other approaches toreligious education | 40 |
| 4.3 The interpretive approach compared to the religious literacy approach | 41 |
| 4.4 Discussion | 44 |
| 4.5 Three academic debates: A summary | 50 |
| Part III: Conceptual approach | 51 |
---|
| 5. Analytical horizon | 52 |
| 5.1 Introduction | 52 |
| 5.2 Ontological and epistemological background | 52 |
| 5.3 Complexity reduction | 54 |
| 5.4 Materiality | 56 |
| 5.5 Difference | 58 |
| 6. Toolkit for analysis | 59 |
| 6.1 Viscosity | 59 |
| 6.2 Boundaries | 61 |
| 6.3 Work | 63 |
| 6.4 Conclusions | 65 |
| Part IV: Research Design | 67 |
---|
| 7. Methodology: Case study and generalisation | 68 |
| 7.1 Introduction | 68 |
| 7.2 The art of generalising to a population | 69 |
| 7.3 The logic of generalising to theory: | 71 |
| 7.4 Why choose Norway? | 72 |
| 7.5 Why choose education? | 73 |
| 7.6 Case study conclusions | 74 |
| 8. Methods | 75 |
| 8.1 Methods introduction | 75 |
| 8.2 Multiple methods | 75 |
| 8.3 Choice of texts | 77 |
| 8.4 Document analysis: Analytical strategy | 80 |
| 8.5 Selecting schools | 81 |
| 8.6 Gaining access to schools | 83 |
| 8.7 Research role: My presence in the field | 85 |
| 8.8 Method conclusions | 87 |
| Part V: Background | 89 |
---|
| 9. Historical Background | 90 |
| 9.1 Religious education and national identity in Norway: Introduction | 90 |
| 9.2 Building the state, becoming Norwegianand developing modernity | 91 |
| 9.3 The historical background: Some analytical points | 93 |
| 9.4 Contexts for the contemporary subject | 96 |
| 9.5 The contemporary subject: Implementing KRL | 100 |
| 9.6 The contemporary subject: The legal history of KRL and RLE | 104 |
| 9.7 The modern subject: The revisions | 105 |
| 9.8 The modern subject: As it stands today | 107 |
| 9.9 Conclusions | 108 |
| 10. The schools. An ethnographic context | 110 |
| 10.1 Introduction | 110 |
| 10.2 Four vignettes from classrooms: Dealing with disagreement | 111 |
| 10.3 Differences between the schools | 114 |
| 10.4 Similarities between the schools | 117 |
| 10.5 Conclusions | 121 |
| Part VI: Analysis | 123 |
---|
| 11. Document analysis: Values, religion and identity in the formal curriculum | 124 |
| 11.1 Introduction | 124 |
| 11.2 Outlining the meaning web | 126 |
| 11.3 The metaphorical structure of the values-node | 137 |
| 11.4 Conclusion | 141 |
| 12. Classroom analysis | 143 |
| 12.1 Introduction | 143 |
| 12.2 The boundary work of a Norwegian Muslim identity | 144 |
| 12.3 The boundary work of a Norwegian Muslim identity: Analysis | 146 |
| 12.4 The boundary work of a Norwegian enlightenment identity | 152 |
| 12.5 The boundary work of a Norwegian enlightenment identity:Analysis | 154 |
| 12.6 Boundary work and identity: Discussion | 157 |
| 12.7 Conclusions | 159 |
| 13. Relating to academic debates | 161 |
| 13.1 Introduction | 161 |
| 13.2 Representing religion in classroom: Developing the interpretive approach | 162 |
| 13.3 National identity and Norwegian Sexualities | 167 |
| 13.4 Multiculturalism | 175 |
| 13.6 Conclusions | 179 |
| Part VII: Conclusion | 181 |
---|
| 14. Conclusion | 181 |
| Table of figures and examples | 187 |
---|
| References | 189 |