: Rosalind J . Gabin, ed
: Discourse Studies in Honor of James L. Kinneavy
: Digitalia
: 9780916379575
: 1
: CHF 62.80
:
: Philosophie, Religion
: English
: 263
: DRM
: PC/MAC/eReader/Tablet
: PDF

Fifteen new essays on the history and theory of rhetoric, the art of composition, discourse education over history, academic writing programs, ethics and language, rhetoric and literature, the evangelical movement and American advertising, etc.. A fitting tribute to the distinguished career of James L Kinneavy, author of A Theory of Discourse and The Greek Rhetorical Origins of Christian Faith.

PART ONE: Classical and Modem Rhetoric (p. 1)

Classical and Modem Rhetoric: The Basic Issues

Edward PJ. Corbett


The basic issue in thé classical period was whether rhetoric or philosophy would be thé dominant élément in thé Greek educational System. Plato became thé leading exponent of pnilosophy as thé suprême discipline, Isocrates and many of thé sophists stood for rhetoric.

Later on, Aristotle too became an advocate for rhetoric. It was not that Aristotle was opposed to philosophy. After ail, he was a student of Plato`s in thé Academy, he himself taught philosophy, and he is known today mainly as a philosopher.

Not only did Aristotle see that there was a place for grammar, dialectic, and rhetoric in thé conduct of human affairs, but he also saw that there had to be a place for thèse vital language arts.

A state could not survive, much less flourish, if thé citizens who had a vote could not exchange words correctly, logically, and persuasively. There had to be toilers in thé vineyards and workers in thé marketplace to make such a society work, but there also had to be governors.

Plato claimed that philosophy could best prépare thé governors for leadership in thé state, Aristotle claimed that rhetoric could best prépare those governors to be effective communicators. So thé provinces of thèse two disciplines seemed to be sharply delineated. But instead of thèse two disciplines becoming ancillary endeavors, they became rivais.

And thereon hangs a taie. The rivalry between rhetoric and philosophy during thé fourth century in Athens charged thé intellectual atmosphère with a sparkmg electricity and led to some achievements in thé academy, in thé government, and, yes, i thé military. But there was a lot of pushing and shoving going on between thé two disciplines.

One of thé issues that became a point of contention between rhetoric and philosophy was whether citizens must ferret out thé truth in any area of human affairs before they could act effectively and responsibly. Truth was spelled with a capital Tin Socrates` and Plato`s play-book (actually, of course, truth was spelled in Greek with a capital Alpha-Aletheià).

The Greek philosophers contended that in thé conduct of human affairs, citizens should ascertain thé"truth of thé matter" before deciding on a course of action. Opinions, beliefs, or probabilities were not reliable grounds for actions.

If you look at Plato`s dialogues, you fïnd Socrates constantly engaged with his students and his friends in an anxious search for truth. Dialectics was thé device that philosophers used to seek out and to pin down thé elusive truth. Anything less than thé truth was as insubstantial and as evanescent as thé shadows cast on thé walls of thé cave in Plato`s famous allegory in The Republic.

Aristotle and his students in thé academy were also seeking thé truth, but realists as they were, they recognized that thé"truth of thé matter" in contingent human affairs was not always accessible or ascertainable. If thé burden of proof in a court trial is on thé accusers, not on thé défendant, thé prosecutor has to discover thé damning évidence or try to elicit it from thé witnesses.
Contents6
Biographical Introduction: Vir Bonus Agendi Peritus10
Some JLK Students Speak23
Acknowledgments31
JLK: The Bibliography32
The Essays: Our Tribute to James L. Kinneavy36
Part One: CLASSICAL AND MODERN RHETORIC38
Classical Rhetoric: The Basic Issues38
A Rhetoric of Ethics and Cultural Understanding: The Quest of Isocrates48
Refiguring Rhetoric: Aristotle's Concept of Techne62
Nineteenth Century Scottish Rhetoric: The Missing Link Between Classical and Modern78
Part Two: POSTMODERN PERSPECTIVES92
Two Propositions: On the Hermeneutics of Suspicion and on Writing the History of Rhetoric92
Rhetoric and Post-Deconstructionism: A Relationist Theory of Meaning110
Social Rhetoric and Political Action128
Part Three: THE TEACHING OF WRITING143
Fred Newton Scott and the Reform Movement of the 1890s143
Is There a Place for Classical Rhetoric in the Teaching of Composition Today?158
Kinneavy's Theory of Discourse and the College English Major175
175
175
186175
Part Four: SCIENCE, ETHICS, AND ADVERTISING205
Voice in Scientific Discourse205
Ethics Across the Curriculum217
The Promised Land: The Rhetoric of Religion and the Development of American Advertising227
Epilogue:227
Epilogue:227
249227
Index253
A253
B253
C253
D254
E254
F254
G254
H255
I255
J255
K255
L255
M256
N256
O256
P256
Q257
R257
S257
T257
U257
V257
W258
Y258
Z258
Tabula gratulatoria259