: Tim Meyer
: Tim Meyer
: Vascular Disruptive Agents for the Treatment of Cancer
: Springer-Verlag
: 9781441966094
: 1
: CHF 132.90
:
: Nichtklinische Fächer
: English
: 256
: Wasserzeichen
: PC/MAC/eReader/Tablet
: PDF
Angiogenesis (formation of new vessels from pre-existing ones) is a crucial early event in the process of tumor development. New vessels supply the tumor with nutrients that are needed for further local growth and enable distant metastases (Folkman 1995). Judah Folkman (1971) highlighted the potential therapeutic imp- cations of tumor angiogenesis. He hypothesized that if tumor angiogenesis is inhibited, then tumor growth and metastasis will be impaired greatly or even impossible. The subsequent quest for endogenous and exogenous inhibitors of angiogenesis has yielded a variety of promising therapeutic agents that block one or more angiogenic pathways, a few of which have been approved by the FDA (e. g. , bevacizumab, sorafenib, sunitinib) for use as single agents or in combination with chemotherapy in specific populations of cancer patients (Sessa et al. 2008). There has also been a dramatic expansion in the exploration of novel anti-angiogenic agents pre-clinically and in clinical trials (Ferrara 2002). Some of the most promising data comes from the development of agents that inhibit one of the key growth factors involved in tumor angiogenesis - vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) (Ferrara et al. 2003). Bevacizumab is a monoclonal antibody against VEGF that was the first an- angiogenic agent that improved significantly the overall survival of patients with colorectal and non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (Ferrara et al. 2005). Various agents that target tumor angiogenesis are currently under investigation in different cancer types in many clinical trials (Ferrara and Kerbel 2005).

Dr. Tim Meyer is a Senior Lecturer in Medical Oncology at the UCL Cancer Institute in London where he specialises in gastrointestinal cancers and drug development. He trained in medicine at UCL and obtained his PhD from London University, after which he completed specialist training in medical oncology. His major research focus is antibody-based vascular targeting.
<
Vascular Disruptive Agentsfor the Treatment of Cancer3
Contents5
Contributors7
Development of Vascular Disrupting Agents10
1 Introduction10
2 Early Studies Supporting the Development of Vascular Disrupting Cancer Therapies14
2.1 Testicular Torsion14
2.2 William Henry Woglom15
2.3 Tumor Clamping Studies15
2.4 Coley’s Toxins16
3 Vascular Disrupting Therapies Employing High Molecular Weight Agents17
3.1 Engineered Ligands17
3.2 Antibody-Based Approaches18
3.3 Gene Therapy19
4 Small Molecule Vascular Disrupting Agents21
4.1 Metals and Metalloids21
4.2 Flavonoids/Xanthenones21
4.3 N-Cadherin Antagonists22
4.4 Colchicine22
4.5 Novel Vascular Disrupting Tubulin Depolymerizing Agents23
5 Combining VDAs with Other Therapies25
6 Clinical Experience with VDAs26
7 Concluding Remarks28
References28
Part I Pre-Clinical Development37
The Discovery and Characterisation of Tumour Endothelial Markers38
1 Vascular Tumor Targeting: Concepts and Definitions38
2 Methodologies for the Discovery of Vascular Tumor Targets39
3 Ligand-Based Pharmacodelivery Applications42
4 Validated Vascular Tumor Targets43
4.1 EDA and EDB Domains of Fibronectin43
4.2 Extra Domains of Within Tenascin-C44
4.3 Endoglin44
4.4 Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen45
4.5 Annexin A145
4.6 Phosphatidylserine Phospholipids45
4.7 VEGF-A and VEGF Receptors46
4.8 Integrins46
4.9 Robo446
4.10 Other TEM’s Endosialin/TEM1 and TEM747
5 Products in Clinical Development and Concluding Remarks47
References49
The Use of Animal Models in the Assessment of Tumour Vascular Disrupting Agents (VDAs)56
1 Introduction56
2 Animal Models57
2.1 General Considerations57
2.2 Subcutaneous and Other Ectopic Models58
2.3 Orthotopic and Metastatic Models59
2.4 Autochthonous Tumour Models59
2.5 Isolated Limb Perfusion in Rats60
2.6 Transgenic Knockout Mice60
2.7 Zebrafish61
3 Assays for Vascular Function62
3.1 General Considerations62
3.2 Blood Flow Rate62
3.3 High Frequency Micro-ultrasound63
3.4 Doppler Optical Coherence Tomography (DOCT)65
3.5 Laser Doppler Flowmetry and Near Infrared Spectroscopy65
3.6 Multifluorescence Microscopy65
3.7 Matrigel Plug Assay67
3.8 Intravital Video Microscopy68
4 Assays for Vascular Morphology69
4.1 Microvascular Corrosion Casting of Tumour Architecture69
4.2 Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM)69
4.3 Confocal Laser Scanning Microscopy (CLSM) and Multi-Photon Fluorescence Microscopy (MPFM)70
5 Non-invasive Imaging71
5.1 General Considerations71
5.2 Bioluminescence/Fluorescence Imaging71
5.3 Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy (MRS) and Imaging (MRI)72
5.4 Positron Emission Tomography (PET)75
5.5 Scintigraphic Imaging of Tumour Hypoxia75
6 Other Assays76
6.1 Hollow Fibre Assay76
6.2 Wick-in-Needle Method for the Measurement of Interstitial Fluid Pressure (IFP)76
References77
Combination Therapy with Chemotherapy and VDAs83
1 Introduction83
2 Combining VDAs and Chemotherapy84
2.1 Complementary Targeting of Different Regions of the Tumor (Spatial Cooperation)84
2.2 Synergistic Activity on the Same Tumor Compartment90
2.3 Combination with Agents That Exploitthe Microenvironmental Changes Induced by VDAs91
2.4 Combination with Agents That Potentiate the Activityof VDAs, Reduce Resistance to Them or Limit Their Toxicity91
2.5 Modification in Blood Flow: Effects on Cytotoxic Drug Pharmacokinetics92
3 Sequencing and Timing93
4 Toxicity95
5 Conclusions96
References97
Lessons from Animal Imaging in Preclinical Models100
1 Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Tumour Vasculature100
2 Why Use MRI for VDA Assessment?101
3 Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI102
3.1 Preclinical Assessment of ZD6126 Using DCE-MRI103
3.2 Preclinical Assessment of CA4P Using DCE-MRI105
3.3 Preclinical Assessment of DMXAA Using DCE-MRI106
3.4 Preclinical DCE-MRI Summary107
4 Susceptibility Contrast MRI108
4.1 Preclinical Assessment of VDAs Using Susceptibility Contrast MRI