| Vascular Disruptive Agentsfor the Treatment of Cancer | 3 |
|---|
| Contents | 5 |
| Contributors | 7 |
| Development of Vascular Disrupting Agents | 10 |
| 1 Introduction | 10 |
| 2 Early Studies Supporting the Development of Vascular Disrupting Cancer Therapies | 14 |
| 2.1 Testicular Torsion | 14 |
| 2.2 William Henry Woglom | 15 |
| 2.3 Tumor Clamping Studies | 15 |
| 2.4 Coley’s Toxins | 16 |
| 3 Vascular Disrupting Therapies Employing High Molecular Weight Agents | 17 |
| 3.1 Engineered Ligands | 17 |
| 3.2 Antibody-Based Approaches | 18 |
| 3.3 Gene Therapy | 19 |
| 4 Small Molecule Vascular Disrupting Agents | 21 |
| 4.1 Metals and Metalloids | 21 |
| 4.2 Flavonoids/Xanthenones | 21 |
| 4.3 N-Cadherin Antagonists | 22 |
| 4.4 Colchicine | 22 |
| 4.5 Novel Vascular Disrupting Tubulin Depolymerizing Agents | 23 |
| 5 Combining VDAs with Other Therapies | 25 |
| 6 Clinical Experience with VDAs | 26 |
| 7 Concluding Remarks | 28 |
| References | 28 |
| Part I Pre-Clinical Development | 37 |
| The Discovery and Characterisation of Tumour Endothelial Markers | 38 |
| 1 Vascular Tumor Targeting: Concepts and Definitions | 38 |
| 2 Methodologies for the Discovery of Vascular Tumor Targets | 39 |
| 3 Ligand-Based Pharmacodelivery Applications | 42 |
| 4 Validated Vascular Tumor Targets | 43 |
| 4.1 EDA and EDB Domains of Fibronectin | 43 |
| 4.2 Extra Domains of Within Tenascin-C | 44 |
| 4.3 Endoglin | 44 |
| 4.4 Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen | 45 |
| 4.5 Annexin A1 | 45 |
| 4.6 Phosphatidylserine Phospholipids | 45 |
| 4.7 VEGF-A and VEGF Receptors | 46 |
| 4.8 Integrins | 46 |
| 4.9 Robo4 | 46 |
| 4.10 Other TEM’s Endosialin/TEM1 and TEM7 | 47 |
| 5 Products in Clinical Development and Concluding Remarks | 47 |
| References | 49 |
| The Use of Animal Models in the Assessment of Tumour Vascular Disrupting Agents (VDAs) | 56 |
| 1 Introduction | 56 |
| 2 Animal Models | 57 |
| 2.1 General Considerations | 57 |
| 2.2 Subcutaneous and Other Ectopic Models | 58 |
| 2.3 Orthotopic and Metastatic Models | 59 |
| 2.4 Autochthonous Tumour Models | 59 |
| 2.5 Isolated Limb Perfusion in Rats | 60 |
| 2.6 Transgenic Knockout Mice | 60 |
| 2.7 Zebrafish | 61 |
| 3 Assays for Vascular Function | 62 |
| 3.1 General Considerations | 62 |
| 3.2 Blood Flow Rate | 62 |
| 3.3 High Frequency Micro-ultrasound | 63 |
| 3.4 Doppler Optical Coherence Tomography (DOCT) | 65 |
| 3.5 Laser Doppler Flowmetry and Near Infrared Spectroscopy | 65 |
| 3.6 Multifluorescence Microscopy | 65 |
| 3.7 Matrigel Plug Assay | 67 |
| 3.8 Intravital Video Microscopy | 68 |
| 4 Assays for Vascular Morphology | 69 |
| 4.1 Microvascular Corrosion Casting of Tumour Architecture | 69 |
| 4.2 Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) | 69 |
| 4.3 Confocal Laser Scanning Microscopy (CLSM) and Multi-Photon Fluorescence Microscopy (MPFM) | 70 |
| 5 Non-invasive Imaging | 71 |
| 5.1 General Considerations | 71 |
| 5.2 Bioluminescence/Fluorescence Imaging | 71 |
| 5.3 Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy (MRS) and Imaging (MRI) | 72 |
| 5.4 Positron Emission Tomography (PET) | 75 |
| 5.5 Scintigraphic Imaging of Tumour Hypoxia | 75 |
| 6 Other Assays | 76 |
| 6.1 Hollow Fibre Assay | 76 |
| 6.2 Wick-in-Needle Method for the Measurement of Interstitial Fluid Pressure (IFP) | 76 |
| References | 77 |
| Combination Therapy with Chemotherapy and VDAs | 83 |
| 1 Introduction | 83 |
| 2 Combining VDAs and Chemotherapy | 84 |
| 2.1 Complementary Targeting of Different Regions of the Tumor (Spatial Cooperation) | 84 |
| 2.2 Synergistic Activity on the Same Tumor Compartment | 90 |
| 2.3 Combination with Agents That Exploitthe Microenvironmental Changes Induced by VDAs | 91 |
| 2.4 Combination with Agents That Potentiate the Activityof VDAs, Reduce Resistance to Them or Limit Their Toxicity | 91 |
| 2.5 Modification in Blood Flow: Effects on Cytotoxic Drug Pharmacokinetics | 92 |
| 3 Sequencing and Timing | 93 |
| 4 Toxicity | 95 |
| 5 Conclusions | 96 |
| References | 97 |
| Lessons from Animal Imaging in Preclinical Models | 100 |
| 1 Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Tumour Vasculature | 100 |
| 2 Why Use MRI for VDA Assessment? | 101 |
| 3 Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI | 102 |
| 3.1 Preclinical Assessment of ZD6126 Using DCE-MRI | 103 |
| 3.2 Preclinical Assessment of CA4P Using DCE-MRI | 105 |
| 3.3 Preclinical Assessment of DMXAA Using DCE-MRI | 106 |
| 3.4 Preclinical DCE-MRI Summary | 107 |
| 4 Susceptibility Contrast MRI | 108 |
| 4.1 Preclinical Assessment of VDAs Using Susceptibility Contrast MRI | <