| Preface | 6 |
---|
| Contents | 8 |
---|
| Contributors | 10 |
---|
| About the Authors | 12 |
---|
| Introduction | 16 |
---|
| 1 The Changing Management Context | 18 |
| 2 New Public Management and New Managerialism | 19 |
| 3 Higher Education Reforms and Middle-Level Academic Management | 21 |
| 4 Outline of the Volume | 24 |
| References | 28 |
| Academic Middle Managers Under the New Governance Regime at Austrian Universities | 30 |
---|
| 1 From the Chair System to New Public Management | 30 |
| 2 New Public Management and Academic Middle Managers | 32 |
| 2.1 Academic Management -- A New Concept | 32 |
| 2.2 Who Are the Academic Middle Managers at Austrian Universities? | 34 |
| 2.3 Is There a Decrease or Increase of Bureaucratic Overload? | 35 |
| 3 Inconsistencies in the New Governance Pattern | 36 |
| 3.1 Contradictions Between Open Access and the New Focus on Output Indicators | 37 |
| 3.2 The Awkward Situation of Junior Faculty | 40 |
| Notes | 42 |
| References | 44 |
| The Changing Role of Academic Leadership in Australia and the Netherlands: Who Is the Modern Dean | 46 |
---|
| 1 Introduction | 46 |
| 2 The Australian Higher Education Sector | 48 |
| 3 The Dutch Higher Education Sector | 51 |
| 4 Corporate Governance, New Public Management and University Governance Structures | 54 |
| 5 Academic Leadership and the Changing Nature of the Deanship | 56 |
| 6 The Roles and Activities of Academic Deans | 59 |
| 7 Australian and Dutch Deans Speaking for Themselves | 60 |
| 7.1 The Research Project | 60 |
| 7.2 Between Country Differences | 61 |
| 7.3 Within Country Differences | 62 |
| 7.4 Across Country Similarities | 63 |
| 8 Conclusion | 65 |
| Notes | 66 |
| References | 67 |
| Academic Middle Managers and Management in University Colleges and Universities in Belgium | 70 |
---|
| 1 Introduction | 70 |
| 2 In Search of Managerialism | 71 |
| 3 Do Middle Managers of Institutions of Higher Education Recognise Characteristics of Managerialism | 74 |
| 3.1 Presentation of the Questions and Research Design | 74 |
| 3.2 Vision on Some Aspects of Managerialism | 76 |
| 3.3 Some Forms of Managerialist Performance | 81 |
| 3.3.1 Decentralisation of Decision Making | 81 |
| 3.3.2 Efficient Management | 85 |
| 3.3.3 Quality Assurance | 87 |
| 3.3.4 Accountability | 88 |
| 4 Has the Situation Changed | 90 |
| 5 Conclusion and Discussion | 91 |
| Notes | 94 |
| References | 94 |
| The Roles and Responsibilities of Middle Management (Chairs and Deans) in Canadian Universities | 97 |
---|
| 1 Introduction | 97 |
| 2 Canadian Universities: Organisation and Governance | 98 |
| 2.1 Chairs and Deans: Change Over Time | 99 |
| 3 Institutional Policies on Chairs and Deans | 104 |
| 3.1 Findings | 104 |
| 3.1.1 Department Chairs | 105 |
| 3.1.2 Faculty Deans | 108 |
| 4 Analysis and Conclusions | 112 |
| Notes | 114 |
| References | 115 |
| Middle-Level University Managers in Italy: An Ambiguous Transition | 117 |
---|
| 1 Introduction | 117 |
| 2 Reform and Governance | 118 |
| 3 Middle-Level University Managers | 124 |
| 4 Conclusions | 128 |
| References | 130 |
| Presidents and Deans in French Universities: A Collective Approach to Academic Leadership | 132 |
---|
| 1 Introduction | 132 |
| 2 A Stronger Leadership at the University Level than at the Faculty Level | 134 |
| 2.1 Leadership Styles and Opinions About University Governance: Discrepancies Between the Presidents and Deans | 135 |
| 2.1.1 Presidents as Managers, Deans as Primus Inter Pares | 135 |
| 2.1.2 Opinions About University Rationalisation: A Gap Between the University Level and the Grassroots | 138 |
| 2.2 Some Explanatory Factors | 139 |
| 2.2.1 The President as the Only Recipient of University Autonomy: An Overview of the Reforms in France from 1968 to 2007 | 139 |
| 2.2.2 The Deans' Status | 141 |
| 2.2.3 The Unclearness of UFR Frontiers and Prerogatives | 141 |
| 3 Governance Coalitions and Academic Leadership in Three Universities | 142 |
| 3.1 Three Universities, Three Governing Coalitions | 142 |
| 3.1.1 South University: An Alliance Between the President and the Deans | 142 |
| 3.1.2 East University: An Alliance Between the President and the Administration | 143 |
| 3.1.3 West University: An Isolated President and a Powerful Administration | 143 |
| 3.2 Governing Coalitions and Academic Leadership | 144 |
| 3.2.1 South University: A Double-Edged Partnership on Both Sides | 144 |
| 3.2.2 East University: Managers at the University Level but Passive Deans | 145 |
| 3.2.3 West University: Powerful Administration and Reluctant Academic Leaders | 146 |
| 3.3 The Stability of Governance Styles | 149 |
| 3.3.1 The President, the Administration and the Deans: A Zero Sum Game? | 149 |
| 3.3.2 The Effects of Outsiders' Behaviour on the Governance Coalition | 150 |
| 3.3.3 Social Exchanges Within Presidential Teams | 150 |
| 4 Conclusion | 152 |
| Notes | 153 |
| References | 154 |
| From Democracy to Management-Oriented Leadership The Manager-Academic in Norwegian Higher Education | 157 |
---|
| 1 Introduction | 157 |
| 2 New Options in the Hands of the Institutional Board | 158 |
| 3 Advocates and Opponents | 161 |
| 4 Recent Developments and Tendencies The End of Elective Leadership | 162 |
| 5 A Move from Democracy
|