: Merle Grobbel
: Implementing Climate Change Measures in the EU Key Success Factors
: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften (GWV)
: 9783531913285
: 1
: CHF 47.60
:
: Politikwissenschaft
: English
: 409
: Wasserzeichen/DRM
: PC/MAC/eReader/Tablet
: PDF
What changed in the United States with Hurricane Katrina was a feeling that we have entered a period of consequences. - Al Gore On February 05, 2007, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) published the executive summary of its fourth assessment report (to be published April 06, 2007). In the summary, it not only acknowledged that climate change is happening at an accelerated rate, but also that its consequences would be dreary: changes in precipitation and in wind patterns, a rise of the sea levels, and desert- cation will globally impact the frequency of disasters and impair living standards. Whether or not we believe climate change is happening, over the past two years, we have witnessed a rise of the topic from oblivion to ubiquity and have experienced a growing emphasis on ?nding measures to prevent climate change. There is an unprecedented agreement among environmentalists, politicians, the public, and industry that we have to take effective action. Politicians are putting their creative plans to action unusually fast: Australia bans the light bulb, B- gium switches off lamps along lighted highways, and the US introduces daylight savings time two weeks earlier than in previous years. Industry, the most unlikely candidate for support, is rallying together in action groups like US-Cap or 2 Grad, and more and more consumers are offsetting their emissions through websites like myclimate.

Merle Grobbel holds a PhD in Political Science (Public Policy) and works as a consultant for McKinsey& Company.
Contents7
List of Tables14
List of Figures16
Introduction21
1.1 Research Question22
1.2 Scope23
1.3 Goals25
1.4 Implications for the Structure of Analysis27
1.5 Plan of the Book29
Status of Implementation: Analyses and Insights36
The Problem at the Outset: Lingering Implementation Issues37
2.1 Transposition of Directives37
2.2 Infringements40
2.3 Conclusion46
Help Needed: (Im)practical Solutions and Research Gaps48
3.1 Solution Patterns48
3.2 EU Initiatives For Improvement of Transposi-tion50
3.3 German Initiatives for Improvement56
3.4 Research on Success Factors of Implementation59
3.5 Conclusion66
Setting Up Research: Complications68
4.1 Status of Implementation Research68
4.2 Top-Down and Bottom-Up Debate70
4.3 Implications for Methodology76
4.4 Implications For The Level of Analysis78
4.5 Implications for the Definition of Implementa-tion80
4.6 Implications for Scope86
4.7 Bias88
4.8 Conclusion89
A Model of the Design Phase92
An Alternative Approach: LeibnizSystem93
5.1 Logic-Based Intelligent Systems93
5.2 LeibnizSystem Explained97
5.3 Conclusion113
Setup of the Model115
6.1 Variables of the Design Phase115
6.2 Assumptions125
6.3 Conclusion134
The Model136
7.1 Scenarios136
7.2 Scenario Results138
7.3 Conclusion150
Interpretation of Results152
8.1 Variables152
8.2 Clauses159
8.3 Conclusion170
Comparing Results to Regression Results173
9.1 Regression: Why or Why Not173
9.2 Choosing the Appropriate Regression174
9.3 Regression on Scenarios177
9.4 Tests Applied to the Model178
9.5 Regression Results182
9.6 Comparison of Accuracy185
9.7 Conclusion187
Factors of the Implementation Process: Survey and Interviews188
EU Survey Setup189
10.1 Taxonomy of Instruments189
10.2 EU Emission Trading System (EU ETS) and EU Survey195
10.3 Survey Design198
10.4 Conclusion205
Survey Results208
11.1 Overall Results208
11.2 Results: Groups211
11.3 Results: Regions219
11.4 Results: Members226
11.5 Results: States231
11.6 Conclusion236
Additional Insights From the Survey239
12.1 Results for Governments239
12.2 Participants’ Verbal Feedback242
12.3 Conclusion252
Preparation of Interviews257
13.1 Preparations257
13.2 Selection of Directives and Interviewees272
13.3 Conclusion274
Interview Results275
14.1 Appraisal of Issue Tree275
14.2 Hypotheses283
14.3 Conclusion311
A Model of Implementation318
Model Parameters319
15.1 A Process of Implementation?319
15.2 Actors and Behavioral Assumptions327
15.3 Constraints of Action - Institutions and Orga-nizations331
15.4 Driving Forces333
15.5 Compatibility with Existing Models334
15.6 Conclusion345
The Implementation Model347
16.1 A New Model347
16.2 The Process349
16.3 Determinants351
16.4 Actors355
16.5 Behavior360
16.6 Model Results364
16.7 Conclusion377
Conclusion379
17.1 Goals379
17.2 Factors381
17.3 Models382
17.4 Further Research385
Bibliography387